Ngày đăng: 05/07/2019
A Rumblings report on Buffalo’s seventh-round rookie tight end
" />Skip to main contentclockmenumore-arrownoyesHorizontal - WhiteBuffalo Rumblingsa Buffalo Bills communityLog In or Sign UpLog InSign UpFanpostsFanshotsSectionsBillsOddsShopAboutMastheadCommunity GuidelinesStubHubMoreAll 322 blogs on Horizontal - WhiteFanposts Fanshots Sections NewsNotesOpinionAnalysisDiscussionPodcastNFL DraftSalary CapFiled under:NFL DraftNotesScouting ReportsScouting report: Buffalo Bills tight end Tommy SweeneyNew White Marshall Newhouse Jerseys ,8commentsA Rumblings report on Buffalo’s seventh-round rookie tight endEDTShareTweetShareShareScouting report: Buffalo Bills tight end Tommy SweeneyFollowing the close of the 2018 season, the Buffalo Bills have made it clear they want to see more from the tight ends on their roster. Cutting Charles Clay then adding Tyler Kroft and Jake Fischer in free agency, the Bills also addressed the position via the draft. After adding Dawson Knox in the third round, Buffalo double-dipped in the seventh with Tommy Sweeney. The 228th pick, Sweeney hails from Boston College, whose mascot is a less valuable version of SUNY Brockport’s. A four-year player for Boston, Sweeney had consistent production from his sophomore season to his senior. In that three-year span his best season of 36 catches, 512 yards and four touchdowns isn’t a far cry from his worst (32 catches, 348 yards, three touchdowns). The Eagles weren’t known for a high-volume passing attack. Sweeney’s most prolific year, detailed above, led the team in yards and touchdowns.Sweeney is an under-the-radar player with very little to discuss outside of stats and profile narratives. If you search “Tommy Sweeney scandal” or “controversy” one of the first results is what appears to be a professional landscaper. I don’t know what scandalous landscaping he’s been up to, but it’s not the right Tommy Sweeney, so I’ll leave you with the mystery. For size, Tommy Sweeney is mostly average. A slightly shorter arm length than average for the position isn’t ideal, but certainly not a major issue. The drill results are underwhelming Marshall Newhouse Jerseys 2019 , although an injury during the combine prevented him from performing to his fullest. His pro day filled in some of the gaps but, regardless, the chart above tells the story. Tommy Sweeney was not drafted for athletic upside.Pardon the blurriness, but this is a good example of pros and cons.Sweeney’s strengths seems to suggest his accomplishments are due to technique and attention to detail. Good hands and solid route running made sure he was routinely open for Boston. Sweeney is said to be physical while running to help create space. His attention to detail may have sold him to Sean McDermott. He was often noted helping teammates line up. Additionally, reports praise him for good timing on block and release plays and while running routes. Sweeney’s limited athleticism drew consistent critique. It was cited as contributing to poor yards after the catch. Similarly, Sweeney was said to struggle creating separation without being physical. While his blocking was generally praised, the positives surrounded the run game and blocking in line. Pass blocking was often felt to be incomplete due to low usage. And some blocking. Tommy Sweeney profiles similarly to former Buffalo Bill Nick O’Leary who certainly doesn’t have any famous relatives and may or may not wear gloves to catch. Like Sweeney, Nick O’Leary was fairly average-sized with shorter arms and low-end athleticism. Both were/are willing blockers and capable in the passing game. Another season is in the books, which means we need another in-depth way to look at penalties. How did the Buffalo Bills do as a team when it comes to flags? The masses yearn for answers, and man do we have some! Before we dive in though, I’d like to thank NFLpenalties.com for their unrivaled access to the information I need for these posts. Penalty CountFor a good chunk of this recap, I thought it would be intriguing to compare the 2018 Buffalo Bills to not only the league rates, but also the 2017 Buffalo Bills. League averages for both years are included so we can see how the league shifted as well. When comparing this year’s assessed penalties for the Bills to the rest of the league, it’s not good. While the per-game rates don’t come across as terrible at 0.55 above the norm, it’s fifth-worst in the league. Arguably, the true or total flags better-represents penalty tendency. The Bills are still sixth-worst in the league with that measure. Before we compare the Bills’ two seasons White Trent Murphy Jerseys , note that the league rates went up slightly for both assessed and true counts by 0.1 flags per game. There are two important considerations for this information. First, playoffs tend to lower the rate slightly, so the gap could lessen between the two league years in the coming weeks. Second, the increase is not enough to explain the increase in the Bills’ rates. For the Bills, in both measures they increased more than a full penalty per game. Last year’s team was actually better-than-average when it comes to penalties, making the jump even more glaring. Penalty yardsYardage—the second half of traditional metrics—shows similar patterns to the count data above. The 2017 Bills performed better than league average when it came to assessed yards. They also did much better than the 2018 Bills. This year’s team remains fifth-worst in the league using this metric. For negated yards, both years for the Bills were about the same with 18.53 negated yards in 2017 and 17.75 yards per game this season. While that doesn’t change the findings from everything else, the silver lining is that they weren’t wiping out more positive gains than last year. Penalty harmI thought it’d be fun to show some of the more hidden data points that go into penalty harm. A lot of discussion focuses on yardage (assessed and negated) but there’s plenty of other talking points built into harm. Negated turnovers are quite rare, with only one per season and fortunately both on an opponent. Negated points aren’t incredibly common either but if you wanted a quick look, here you go. In both years, the Bills negated a touchdown. In 2018, Kyle Williams negated an opponent’s extra point which is assessed as negative harm or a “good” thing. In better news, opponents wiped out more points than the Bills in both years.For downs, this is the sum of how many free downs were given to an opposing offense (ex: from defensive holding), or downs negated (ex: from offensive holding). In both years, the Bills impacted more downs than their opponents. The gap was a good deal wider in 2018. Harm rating is shown two ways. The entire season is there for fun Trent Murphy Jerseys 2019 , with the per-game rate likely more relevant. As a home brew stat that’s still fairly fluid when it comes to interpretation, I’ve been indicating that 10.0 per game is the cut-off between good and bad. While that’s not a bad translation, using the two latest seasons of data and considering league data, it brings up the question of why the 2017 Bills are in the range of “bad” when they performed better than league average using standard metrics. It is possible that an above-average team in counts/yards could be worse in harm if, for example, they gave up a high rate of first downs. Without data league-wide, though, it’s very difficult to truly set a line. The idea that teams should aim for under ten is probably a great conclusion from the last few years of data, but it’s possible that 10.5 or thereabouts might be the better average score. Penalties by phaseOne of the more common musings I see is how each phase of the team is doing when it comes to penalties. From the look of the chart it would appear that the offense is really, really bad. Looking at league frequencies though, the Bills are pretty typical in counts by phase. If anything, special teams is the “problem.” The league rate for offense is 58% and 11% for special teams. For the math-minded, that means the Bills’ defense is nearly perfectly average and the offense is a little bit low. The rest of the data is there for fun, but without league-wide data it’s hard to put into context.Penalties by typeThe holiday season might be over, but I have a gift for the avid penalty followers. That’s right, a sortable chart for penalties by type (it works best in desktop). Aw yeah!Penalties by typePenaltyCountAssessed yardsYards affectedDowns -/+Points affectedSum of HarmPenaltyCountAssessed yardsYards affectedDowns -/+Points affectedSum of HarmIf you went ahead and sorted by count White Chris Ivory Jerseys , offensive holding jumps right out at 31. Believe it or not, that’s only eighth-worst in the league. Still bad, but not terribly so. False start? Ninth worst. Defensive holding had the Bills tied for seventh-worst, and when it comes to defensive pass interference they’re tied for eleventh, which is middle of the pack. To compare a bit with pass interference, the league leader New Orleans Saints had 20. Unnecessary roughness and unsportsmanlike conduct penalties weren’t a significant problem. So how did the Bills end up closer to worst than first?While none of the above types were terrible, a decent amount of pretty bad measures adds up. Also, the Bills had the highest volume of assessed illegal-formation penalties in the league. Chicago had one more called than the Bills, but had two declined. Toss in a few similar ones like illegal shift and ineligible downfield flags and they add up to a pre-snap issue on offense. Put that with a higher rate on special teams and you end up near the top of the charts.SummaryLike most things in a league built on parity, there’s not a lot that separates one side of a fence from the other. The 2018 Buffalo Bills really weren’t a far cry from their 2017 counterparts. Pre-snap penalties on offense and a higher-than-normal rate of flags on special teams pulled them from a little better than average to fifth-worst. Many of the more problematic items for the Bills should be able to be cleaned up by having a more steady offseason and tinkering less with lineups. As an example, hitting the league average on illegal formation penalties would have lowered the Bills’ per-game rate to 6.93 penalties. That’s more than halfway back to being average.